On Saturday, the Munich Security Conference hosted some Iranian dissident aspects, the Sharq newspaper writes.

As the conference was held without the presence of Iran, another meeting was kept in Oslo, the capital of Norway, on the topic of human rights, where the Iranian opposition likewise participated.

The meeting at Georgetown University and the invitation of the Iranian opposition to the Davos conference all send out a crucial message.At the Munich meeting, in addition to the presence of the opposition, other speakers, from Zelensky to Rishi Sunak, criticized and assaulted Irans policies.On Thursday in Riyadh, before the start of the Munich conference, the United States and the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council, in a statement implicated Iran of leading destabilizing policies, supporting terrorism, weapons expansion ...

in the region and all over the world, and nuclear provocations.

The Munich conference and other meetings that involve the opposition could lead to diplomatic legitimacy of opposition figures.

Iran must focus on a clever foreign policy rather of severe words to alter the course in its favor.

Arman Melli: Munich conference and Irans challenges Arman Melli writes: Countries usually participate in the Munich Security Conference to exchange views on security issues.

When Iran and Russia are not invited, it is not a very good message.

It is unusual.

Worse than not inviting Iran is welcoming Irans opposition.

In fact, by inviting the opposition, the organizers of the conference symbolically want to send the message that they think what the opposition states.

When Iran exists there, it raises its own security issues and responds to the security concerns of others.

However they have offered the platform to Irans challengers to present Iran as a country, that along with Russia, is harming worldwide security.On the other hand, the primary topics of the conference were the war in Ukraine, i.e.

European security or worldwide security, in which they were speaking about Irans drones, but Iran has not been provided the right to safeguard itself versus the allegations.

Iran is now seen alongside Russia and the damage they want to inflict on Russia will likewise be caused on Iran.

Etemad: Failure to revive JCPOA enforces greatest expense on Iran Failure to revive the nuclear deal, which is a blow to the countrys interests, is due to the particular view towards diplomacy by specific political groups, Etemad writes.

Throughout the Trump era, the policy was not to negotiate with the United States.

But with the modification of government in Washington, it was vital to use this opportunity and Iran and America negotiate with each other to restore the nuclear agreement.Referring to the challenges of the Rouhani federal government in revitalizing the JCPOA, Etemad says: The revival of the JCPOA need to have been agreed upon by all groups [ political factions in Iran], but this did not occur and regardless of reaching a crucial point, it failed.

With the change of the federal government in Iran, not only no arrangement was reached however under the influence of other factors, dialogue to resurrect the JCPOA was set aside.Under the sanctions, neither cooperation with next-door neighbors nor with nations such as China can fix financial problems.However, thinking about the war in Ukraine today, the possibility of dialogue to revive the JCPOA will prove costly for Europe and Biden in view of popular opinion and election contests.

Aftab Yazd: China is not trying to find conflict with U.S.

China purchases Irans oil with the U.S.

green light which is why China is not trying to find a conflict with the U.S.

to safeguard Iran, Aftab Yazd writes.The paper quotes political analyst Sasan Karimi who states: The reality that the West looks for to consist of China needs to not be interpreted as a Cold War.

China is an economic competitor for the West.

As an outcome, Iran should comprehend the worldwide order.

In no other way needs to we consider the worldwide order as a sort of Cold War.On the Iran-China 25-year collaboration arrangement, Karimi also states: The reality is that without the lifting of sanctions, Iran will not be able to gain from the economic, financial, commercial, and business benefits of the agreement.The expert adds the relocation by Arab nations to develop close ties with China is in line with their right understanding of worldwide advancements.

China is looking for stability in the Middle East.

The Arabs likewise do not consider their close relations with the West as a barrier to their cooperation with Beijing and Chinas investment in their own countries and this is something that both China and the West have understood.Kayhan: Contradictions of pro-Western circles about ties with China When the 25-year cooperation document was signed in between Iran and China, pro-Western circles considered it a blow to the countrys independence.But after one or two years, they are bothersome that why the arrangement has not been carried out, so it is useless! At the same time, pro-West people state that Saudi Arabia is ahead of Iran in oil sales and economic collaboration with China, but they did not say that Saudi Arabia has ended up being a nest of China as used to state about Iran.

These contradictions are that China is the biggest trading partner of the U.S.

and some European nations.

And China has actually been Irans biggest trading partner in export and the 2nd biggest partner in import.