TEHRAN - In an interview with Nasser Imani, a political specialist, Hamshahri discussed the developments of the Syrian war.Imani said: Bashar Assads federal government fell 13 years after the wave of protests and riots and the defeat of ISIS in the nation.
What Iran did in all these years to support Syria, contrary to some who only provide it an ideological face, was taking care of the countrys nationwide interests.
The West and the Zionist regime planned to topple Assad so that Syria would be fragmented and would no longer have a military force.
This is the Wests plan for the brand-new Middle East.
At one point, Iran combated ISIS, which as the Westerners themselves acknowledged, was developed with their support.
The main objective of creating ISIS was to counter Iran, but Iran did not let the objective of the West and ISIS bring up.
Iran protected its nationwide interests, not guarding the rule of other countries.
Although the resistance motion was damaged by the events in Syria, this will not continue and the advancements will not remain like this.
In the near future, the impacts of Irans assistance for the resistance front in previous years will be seen.Farhihtegan: Why the 2024 developments not comparable to the 2011s? In a note, Farhikhtgan talked about the overthrow of the Syrian political system and the dissimilarity of the present scenario in Syria with the conditions of the country in 2011.
It stated: The relationship of the Islamic Republic with the Syrian political system was unique throughout the Syrian war.
Iran supported the political system in Syria.
Of course, the basis of Irans relationship with the Syrian political system was to counter the Zionist regime.
There are different reasons why 2024 was not like 2011.
Firstly, even if the Axis Resistance, including Iran, had a choice they did not have the opportunity to execute it due to the fact that of the rapid pace of the advancements.
Obviously, this time the advancements in Syria were different for Iran.
The militant groups did not raise slogans of cross-border or territorial greed versus Iranian soil.
Second, these groups did not take hostile relocations versus the Shiites.
In addition to Iran, Iraqi and Lebanese Shiite groups did not find a factor to handle them.
The attack by the armed groups in 2024 on the Syrian federal government resembled the riot of the Free Army versus it, in which Iran and the Axis of Resistance supported their ally only in the kind of advisor.Donya-e-Eqtesad: The troika opportunism following the Assad fall In an interview with Tahmoures Gholami, a scientist on global problems, Donya-e-Eqtesad went over Irans future negotiations with Europe and the West in the current scenario.
He said: In recent days, the International Atomic Energy Agency when again has actually intensified its pressure on Iran under the influence of the European troika (Britain, France and Germany).
In a new declaration, the troika expressed concern about the boost in Irans enrichment capability.
In part of their statement the trio said, We are likewise incredibly concerned to learn that Iran has increased the number of centrifuges in use and started preparations to install additional enrichment infrastructure, additional increasing Irans enrichment capacity.
Issues have been put on the agenda after the advancements in Syria to put more pressure on Iran.
According to lots of specialists and observers, this problem will not be dealt with without direct or indirect settlements through the development of a channel with the Trump administration.
The current talks in Geneva were ineffective inconclusive.
The fall of the Assad federal government in Damascus has had an undesirable effect on Irans circumstance and its impact ought to not be rejected.
We must not exaggerate about its effectiveness.Iran: The West anxious about balance of power in Irans prefer As the competitors increases in Syria without Assad, the regional stars who see themselves as the victors of the Syrian battle are worried about the fortifying of Tehrans function.
Therefore, local rivals are more worried about the realities that can emerge in the ambiguous circumstance in Syria.
From this point of view, it is natural that different armed groups who have actually toppled the Assad government to avoid the development of such a balance in favor of Tehran, and eventually to make the circumstance complicated with the assistance of nations outside the region.