TEHRAN - In a note, Farhikhtegan went over U.S.
President Anthony Blinkens recent declarations about Iran.It composed: Anthony Blinken confessed in his recent statements at the Council of Foreign Relations think tank that America contributed in the unrest in Iran.
He stresses that modification from the exterior is tough and Washingtons main strategy is based upon Irans internal developments.
These declarations, together with Netanyahus Farsi messages, show a special concentrate on Irans internal demonstrations and attempts to incite social discontent.
An evaluation of the 2022 events reveals 3 key aspects: public frustration in Iran, the function of foreign powers in inciting turmoil, and justifications such as the Mahsa Amini event.
The will of foreigners is beyond Irans control, two other elements depend on Irans domestic policies and actions.
Reducing public discontentment and producing hope for the future are the main steps that can strengthen the resistance of the Iranian society and make foreign strategies inefficient.
Countering public discontent and preventing similar incidents requires fundamental solutions.Sobh-e-No: Challenges and challenges ahead in Tehran-Cairo tiesIn a short article, Sobh-e-No talked about the significance of Pezeshkians trip to Egypt and composed: Despite the favorable possibility of the trip, there are still obstacles in broadening Iran-Egypt relations.
Egypts proximity to Western countries and the Zionist program, historical differences, and concerns about regional responses are among the aspects that can prevent the deepening of relations.
Pezeshkians journey to Cairo and efforts to expand relations in between the 2 countries indicate the beginning of a procedure that can result in the conditioning of cooperation between Tehran and Cairo in the coming years.
Considering the significance of Egypt in the Islamic world and the function of Iran as one of the influential players in the region, an improvement of relations in between these 2 nations will not just benefit Iranian and Egyptian countries it can also play a substantial role in producing stability and cohesion in the Islamic world.
The prospect of Iran-Egypt relations, with the continuation of diplomatic efforts, based upon financial, cultural, and political cooperation, can end up being an effective model for positive interactions in between Islamic nations and prepared for neutralizing the plots of typical enemies.Etemad: A brand-new table for negotiationIn an interview with Esmail Gerami Moghadam, a political analyst and previous MP, Etemad dealt with the statement of Irans preparedness to begin honorable settlements with the West.
He said: Many experts think that these settlements can operationalize the discourse of the 14th (sitting) federal government relating to de-escalation and minimize the increasing pressure of sanctions versus Iran.
Lots of political activists are waiting on the idea of de-escalation to be understood through negotiations with Western nations, Russia, and China.
Individuals of Iran have been under financial pressure for the past few years, and it is essential to supply the ground to eliminate or minimize these pressures as soon as possible.
These issues develop from the considerable pressure of financial sanctions, the option of which depends upon conducting negotiations with Western nations, especially America.
If Iran can establish great and strong financial relations with Western and Eastern countries in addition to neighbors through negotiations it will produce a suitable deterrence in regards to economy and can use these conditions for the benefit of the nation and to enhance the living requirements of the people.Ettelaat: Sanctions against Iran will be tougher in Trump adminTo evaluate and take a look at the prospect of Irans economy, Ettelaat has interviewed economic expert Morteza Afghah.
He stated: The damage brought on by the sanctions to Irans economy over the last few years was even worse than during the Iran-Iraq war due to the fact that Iran had no limitations in exports and imports during the war (in the 1980s).
At that time, Iran had no trade with America but had economic trade with other countries.
Meanwhile, the tightening of sanctions over the last few years has stopped all these exchanges.
Now the reality is that he will be more stringent towards Iran and financial blockade of our nation.
In the existing circumstance, it is expected that Trump, who has actually not changed compared to the past (the very first presidential term) and acquired more experience, to continue the previous strictures versus Iran.
Given that Trump is not in favor of war in general, he tries to have the upper hand in possible settlements with Iran by increasing financial pressure on our country.