U.S.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio pointed the finger at Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela for the migration crisis during a press conference in Costa Rica.Rubio, on a tour through Central America, labeled these countries as enemies of humanity.
He argued that the crisis would not exist without their failed governance.Rubio spoke in San Jos with Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves by his side.
His comments focus on the political and economic systems of these nations which he claims drive citizens away.The U.S.
officials tour included discussions on migration, security, trade, and Chinas influence.
Nicaragua, under Daniel Ortega since 2007, has seen his wife Rosario Murillo rise to co-president.
Rubio criticizes this setup as a family dynasty.He notes the regimes suppression of opposition, including the Catholic Church, as reasons for Nicaraguan migration.
Venezuelas crisis under Maduro has led to an exodus of nearly 7 million people since 2015.U.S.
Secretary of State Blames Migration Crisis on Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
(Photo Internet reproduction)Economic collapse and political repression push Venezuelans out.
Rubios stance reflects U.S.
policy to isolate and sanction these regimes to push for change.
Cubas migration surge relates to the long-standing U.S.
embargo and restricted freedoms.Rubios Regional TourRubio highlights Cubas role in regional instability due to its political and economic policies.
Rubios narrative contrasts these countries with Costa Rica, where stability attracts Americans, showing what good governance can achieve.His tour aims to strengthen U.S.
ties in the region amidst geopolitical tensions, particularly with Chinas growing presence.
This tour marks Rubios first as Secretary of State, starting in Panama, moving through El Salvador, and concluding in the Dominican Republic.His agenda includes reinforcing U.S.
influence while addressing the causes of migration.
The migration crisis not only strains neighboring countries but also tests U.S.
diplomacy.Rubios comments reflect a policy of holding these governments accountable for their actions regional impact.
However, his approach also underscores the complex dynamics of U.S.
foreign policy in Latin America.