TEHRAN - In a commentary, the Iran newspaper went over the two-day Caspian Economic Forum conference hosted by Tehran, participated in by officials from the 5 Caspian littoral countries.The paper specified that the event not just highlighted the Caspian Seas function as a cooperation location but also placed the conference as a potential permanent organization for promoting regional economic cooperation.
Iran views the Caspian Sea drifts as gateways to the international economy, which can be leveraged to establish ports, maritime transport, and a local supply chain.
Irans access to the Persian Gulf, the Sea of Oman, and the Caspian Sea offers unique transit capabilities.
By creating an attractive North-South global transport passage and establishing a transit link in between the Sea of Oman and the Caspian Sea, Tehran can end up being a regional corridor center.
This likewise lays the structure for a robust communication network facilitating the exchange of goods between nations from the Indian Ocean to the Baltic and Scandinavian regions.Ham Mihan: Moscow-Tehran rapprochementIn an article, Ham Mihan resolved the current arrangement between Iran and Russia, stating that it establishes a framework for bilateral cooperation over the next two decades.
It wrote: According to published reports, the agreements military element includes tactical consultations on shared security issues, joint military exercises, and collaborative efforts within the defense industry.
The signing of this file has actually fueled the story of a burgeoning union focused on challenging the United States.
The strengthening of ties in between Iran and Russia gained momentum with the start of the Syrian civil war, throughout which Russian and Iranian actors coordinated their operations and strengthened their influence in Damascus.
However, this arrangement highlights that the rapprochement in between Russia and Iran extends beyond a relationship solely defined by the disputes in Syria and Ukraine.
It indicates a concrete commitment from both countries to integrate their security policies.
Enhancing this point, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi characterized the treaty as not just a political agreement however as a roadmap for the future.
Sobh-e-No: opposition becomes dead woodIn a statement, Sobh-e-No highlighted the anti-Iran groups consistent failures, mentioning: The oppositions disgraces appear endless.
Some insolvent figures persist in their adventurism and fantasies.
The statement continued, pointing out the diminishing support for Reza Pahlavi in Europe: Despite the hostile positions and ongoing antagonism from some European countries towards the Islamic Republic of Iran, recent occasions indicate a growing disillusionment.
The Germans did not welcome Reza Pahlavi at the Munich Conference, the Dutch parliament canceled a joint meeting with him, and even the British declined to grant him an audience.
The truth is that these spent forces within the opposition have lost their appeal, even to European countries.
Sobh-e-No further discussed the response to these problems: The outcry on a number of Western-based Persian-language television channels, the anger of the few staying monarchist fans, and the groups extreme criticism of European countries demonstrate that the hopes of the remnants of the Pahlavi program about a restored Western project have most likely disappeared.
Eventually, the fate of these saboteurs and opposition figures has ended up being clear, even to the Islamic Republic of Irans foreign adversaries.Arman-e-Emrooz: the uncertain future of Iran and U.S.Arman-e-Emrooz discussed the prospective future of Iran-US engagements.
It appears Trump is slowly and progressively increasing his pressure and trying to close the paths for Irans oil exports with China.
In the meantime, it is not likely that the Iranian-European dialogue will have a specific result due to the fact that Europe and the United States do not have any particular distinctions about Iran.
It is more than likely that Tehran will try to avoid the activation of the trigger system by offering concessions to the European celebrations and even the Agency in bilateral talks.
But there is no guarantee that at least among these celebrations will not do this before October 18, 2025.
Trump currently wishes to increase political and economic pressure and even threaten war and attack to achieve the wanted outcome, and we ought to see to what degree Irans internal circumstance can endure these very challenging economic conditions.
Therefore, because of the continuation and climax of sanctions and pressure, internal politics may be the most crucial obstacle dealing with the federal government in the future.
Overall, it is not likely that there will be a development in the relationship in between the United States and Iran in the first two years of Trumps presidency.
If settlements and a contract are reached, it will likely be in the second two years.