The Argentine Senate decisively rejected President Javier Mileis nominees for the Supreme Court, Ariel Lijo and Manuel Garca-Mansilla, in a historic vote.Lijos nomination failed with 43 votes against and 27 in favor, while Garca-Mansilla faced an even harsher defeat, with 51 votes against and only 20 supporting him.This unprecedented rejection highlights deep political divisions and raises questions about the presidents approach to governance.
Milei had appointed the two candidates by decree in February 2025 after failing to secure congressional approval for over a year.This controversial move bypassed the Senates constitutional role in approving Supreme Court justices.
Many senators criticized this decision as an overreach of executive power, arguing it undermined judicial independence.The appointments were made in commission, a rarely used mechanism intended only for urgent situations when Congress is in recess.
The rejection also reflected broader concerns about the nominees themselves.Argentine Senate Rejects Mileis Supreme Court Picks, Exposing Political Tensions.
(Photo Internet reproduction)Lijo, a federal judge, faced allegations of corruption and misconduct, while Garca-Mansilla, an ultra-conservative lawyer known for his anti-abortion stance, provoked ideological opposition.Additionally, senators criticized the lack of gender diversity in Mileis nominations, as the Supreme Court currently consists entirely of male justices.Political Dynamics and Institutional TensionsPolitical dynamics played a significant role in the outcome.
Senators from Mauricio Macris PRO party voted against Mileis nominees, signaling growing tensions between the president and his former allies.The session barely reached quorum, with 38 of 72 senators present, underscoring the fragility of Mileis support in Congress.
The government responded by accusing the Senate of acting out of political motives rather than evaluating the candidates qualifications.A statement from the presidency described the Senate as a refuge for the political caste.
Meanwhile, Milei criticized opposition parties on social media, alleging collusion to block his judicial appointments and other legislative priorities.This defeat weakens Mileis position as president and highlights resistance to his governance style.
The rejection leaves Garca-Mansillas future on the court uncertain and raises doubts about the administrations ability to navigate institutional challenges effectively.