TEHRAN In recent weeks, the conflict in between Iran and the United States has greatly intensified, with Irans tranquil nuclear program at the heart of the issue.While Iran repeatedly verifies its dedication to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and its sovereign privilege to advance serene nuclear technology, the United Statesunder President Donald Trumphas returned to aggressive rhetoric and threats.On March 9, 2025, Irans Permanent Mission to the United Nations restated the countrys desire for discussion.
Nevertheless, Iranian authorities emphasized that the countrys inherent right to tranquil nuclear innovation is non-negotiable.
This principled position was reiterated by Foreign Ministry representative Esmaeil Baqaei on the following day.
Speaking to reporters in a weekly presser, Baqaei emphasized, constructive negotiations must be grounded in shared regard, not risks or coercive diplomacy.
Iran, he worried, wants to engage, however not under pressure.Also, on March 31, right away after Trumps brand-new hazard, Baqaei cautioned, Violence breeds violence, peace begets peace.
The US can select the course ...; and concede to CONSEQUENCES.Escalation through US threatsDespite Irans determined technique, the U.S.
has adopted an increasingly hostile tone.
In a February 9 interview with an American media outlet, Donald Trump claimed he would look for a deal from Iran involving serious military concessions, alerting that failure to comply would lead to him bombing the hell out of the country.On March 13, Trump sent a letter to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei through an emissary from the United Arab Emirates.Subsequently, throughout a March 31 NBC interview, Trump heightened his language again, threatening to let loose battles the likes of which they have never witnessed before if Iran decreases to engage.In a parallel program of force, the U.S.
Air Forces Global Strike Command validated the deployment of B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean, further intensifying tensions.Washingtons financial pressure campaign has likewise heightened, with sanctions focused on crippling Irans oil exports.
These sanctions are the extension of the policy of optimal pressure started throughout Trumps first term, when he unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), abandoning a multilateral arrangement that Iran had completely honored.Irans response: Defiance without provocationWhile recognizing this message, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stressed that Iran would not yield to pressure.
Iran is receptive to indirect discussion, he said, but will not accept threats that compromise its sovereignty and dignity.
President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated this viewpoint on March 30, emphasizing that direct conversations with the United States were not an option since of a deep-rooted skepticism emerging from Americas historical actionsespecially its one-sided exit from the JCPOA.
Iran has never ever impeded the method of indirect talks, he stated, however we will not take part under pressure.In the meantime, the international community has actually revealed considerable concern regarding Washingtons provocative position.
On April 2, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov criticized Trumps hazards as illegal and intolerable, warning that any attack on Irans nuclear sites may lead to substantial chaos in the area.Ryabkov likewise used Russias assistance in mediating talks, advising both sides to adopt a fully grown, diplomatic method.
This is a defining moment that requires dialogue, not saber-rattling, he insisted.Also, the Guardian reported on March 31 that Arab states of the Persian Gulf are wary of U.S.
military action versus Iran, believing it would only deepen local instability.A teaching of restraintFrequently ignored in Western accounts is the religious belief system that shapes Irans nuclear strategy.
Ayatollah Khamenei has provided a binding fatwa forbidding the development or use of nuclear weapons, citing Islamic concepts that decline weapons of mass destruction.This position was enhanced by senior Ali Larijani, a senior aide to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, on March 31.
However, Larijani warned that if Iran is attacked under the false pretext of nuclear aspirations, it may be required to reassess its position under public pressure.Even the U.S.
intelligence companies have actually consistently acknowledged that Iran is not pursuing a nuclear weaponcasting doubts on the reasoning for Washingtons assertive stance.In reaction to escalating risks, Iran officially lodged a complaint with the United Nations Security Council on March 31.
The grievance, presented by Irans UN Ambassador Saied Iravani, asserted that Trumps declarations breach Article 2( 4) of the UN Charter, which forbids threatening or employing force versus a sovereign state.Tehran also summoned the acting head of the Swiss embassy, which looks after the United States interests in Iran, to protest Washingtons risks.
Iran likewise knocked the destabilizing function of the Zionist regime in the area, viewed as a partner in inciting turmoil.In an unique report on March 31, the Tehran Times revealed that Irans armed force has prepared rockets that can target US-associated websites, because of the continuous military threats from the United States.
The report advised the White House to respond, with James Hewitt notifying the Washington Free Beacon that Trump does not take kindly to what he characterized as military hazards .
On April 3, Trump declared that Iran might be all set for direct negotiations, suggesting that intermediaries might no longer be needed.
Iran has not confirmed any change in its position.The path forward: Dialogue, not dominationAs the standoff continues, Iran remains dedicated to peace, stability, and dialogueon the condition that such dialogue is based on mutual respect and worldwide law.Diplomacy, not supremacy, is the only practical path forward.
The United States should now pick between intensifying conflict or going back to the path of reason.Irans message is clear: The doors are open to negotiation, however the countries self-respect is not for sale.