TEHRAN - Kayhan committed its editorial to the current U.S.
sanctions versus Iran and wrote: Without a doubt, it needs to be said that the chain of U.S.
sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, on the eve of the very first and 2nd rounds and now, on the eve of the 3rd round of negotiations, consists of an unique message and the option of dates can not be accidental.Existing proof and previous experiences suggest that the U.S., contrary to what it declares, is not looking for a contract acceptable to the Islamic Republic of Iran and continues to demand its big-headed nature and blackmailing Iran.
The U.S.
wants negotiations for the sake of settlements! Trump is seeking to register negotiations with Iran as an opportunity in his 100-day record and to reveal that the uncompromising Iran has also pertained to the negotiating table.
Irans wisdom and intelligence, which has highlighted indirect settlements, is good.
However, Mr.
Araghchis repeated emphasis that there is neither reason for much optimism nor pessimism is also a sign that they are taking a smart view of the negotiations.Arman-e-Melli: Will the result of talks be win-win despite absence of trust? Arman-e-Melli consulted with former diplomat Ali Khorram about the 2 rounds of talks between Iran and the U.S.
and the possible obstacles and opportunities between the 2 countries.
He stated: The problem of trust comes down to the kind of assurances that Trump will supply to Iran, and the steps that Iran will agree to take.
Iran announced at the really starting that the technology it has is peaceful which it is not looking for nuclear weapons.
After the 2nd round of talks, the New York Times priced estimate the Iranian delegation as stating that Iran is ready to make joint financial investments in the nuclear field with any country, including the U.S.
In such a scenario, any nation that partners with us will understand that Irans nuclear activities are serene.
Without a doubt, this is a big statement and will silence any opponent.
In the existing scenario, Trump enjoys the chance to obtain the approval of Congress because Congress is on his side and is obedient to him.
In such a circumstance, if an agreement is reached in between Iran and the United States, the agreement can be become law with congressional approval.Jam-e-Jam: Changing US priorities and leaving Europe out of talksIn a commentary, Jam-e-Jam talked about the absence of Europe from the indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States and wrote: Recently, the United States has actually shown a higher desire to work out with Iran without European intervention.
The technical negotiations scheduled to be kept in Oman on Saturday are an example of this approach.
Oman, which formerly acted as an arbitrator between Iran and the United States, has now end up being a place for negotiations in which there is no mention of the presence of European representatives.
Reports show that the 3 European powers (France, Britain, and Germany) have actually been totally left out of the procedure.
Some diplomats have told the media that the United States has taken the effort without consulting them and that trust between the celebrations has actually reduced.
Lastly, the talks in Oman and Irans diplomatic relocations with China and Russia suggest that the Iranian nuclear problem is entering a new stage in which Europe plays a limited function.
Europes diminished presence can be seen as a combination of Europes decrease in power, the continents inability to meet its commitments following the U.S.
withdrawal from the JCPOA, and Washingtons altering geopolitical priorities.Iran: Moscows function in the negotiationsIn a note, the Iran newspaper goes over Russias possible function in Iran-U.S.
nuclear talks and said: In these settlements, there are 2 main difficulties: first, the fate of Irans enriched uranium reserves, and 2nd getting company warranties from the West that if Iran adheres to the agreement, sanctions will be permanently lifted which Iran will not suffer if the U.S.
takes out of the agreement once again.
From Irans point of view, the only genuine assurance is the finalizing of an official treaty by the U.S.
Congress.
Iran desires to keep its uranium reserves inside the nation.
Iran believes that it has received informal assurances that reveal that the U.S.
does not mean to damage Irans nuclear program.
One service under factor to consider is to provide Russia the option to return enriched uranium to Iran if the U.S.
breaks the offer.
Such a plan would not just provide Russia a central function in Iran-U.S.
relations but might also minimize the influence of European nations such as Germany, France, and Britain.
This post first appeared/also appeared in Tehran Times