In reference s to the hostile policies of the European Union towards Iran over the last couple of months, especially after the start of the discontent in country, the Sharq newspaper has sought the views of 3 international relations professionals, particularly Hashem Partoy, Rahman Ghahramanpour, and Jalal Khosh-Chehreh.
Partoy describes the conference of the European Parliament to evaluate the situation in Iran and states: The conference can end up drawing up a road map for Europe and other countries such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand ...
against Iran.
Europes policy against Iran, either case in an independent method or in coordination with the United States, reveals that the two sides are on the very same page concerning Iran, Partoy opines.
While declining the argument, Rahman Kahramanpour says: Although in the last 2 years with the election of Joe Biden, the space (between the U.S.
and Europe) has actually decreased and both sides agree on issues such as the war in Ukraine, China or Iran, however the Europeans somehow follow independency.
Ghahramanpour indicates possible EU moves versus Iran consisting of designating the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps as a terrorist group or expelling Iranian ambassadors and says: The European Union still does not have the capability to completely cut off its relations with Iran, since that will put an end for European supervision and management on Irans nuclear case.
According to Jalal Khosh-Chehra, the first situation will be sanctioning some military institutions and people.
The second circumstance refers to the choice of the European Parliament to consist of the name of the IRGC on the list of terrorist groups.
The last situation is to cut ties and expel Iranian ambassadors.
He includes: If the meeting of the European Parliament in France goes from approving to declaring the IRGC as terrorist, it means that European and Western politics have actually moved from debilitating Irans economy to altering the regime, which is an impression.
Beirut is waiting for improvement of Tehran-Riyadh relations In a short article, Arman-e-Melli points out the effect of United States sanctions on Iran-Lebanon cooperation in energy and composes that throughout the visit of Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian to Beirut, he revealed that Iran is ready to send fuel to the nation.
Iran can fulfill Lebanons energy needs in two methods: first, send out fuel to the nation through a contract between the two nations, and secondly, to construct power plant in the country.But Lebanon will face sanction by the U.S.
if it buys fuel from Iran.
In addition to American sanctions, the level of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia likewise affects Tehrans cooperation with Beirut.
Given that the Saudi Arabia thinks about Lebanon as its backyard, the March 14 Alliance in Lebanon, specifically the leaders of the Tayy?r al-Mustaqbal (Future Movement), is an ally of Riyadh, and likewise Saudi Arabia strongly opposes Hezbollahs influence in the Lebanese political scene.
Some political figures in Beirut believe that if the relations in between Tehran and Riyadh gets regular, or at least if the tensions are alleviated, it can reduce Riyadhs pressure on Beirut on its interaction with Tehran.
Farhikhtegan: Crossing Panama Canal is Tehrans latest relocate to broaden influence in U.S.
backyard Farhikhtegan refers to the existence of Iranian ships on high seas and composes: Iran has just recently sent two homegrown destroyers - IRIS Dana and IRIS Makran - for an objective to the South Pacific Ocean.
These 2 ships left Iranian waters 4 months ago to carry out their mission, which has actually caused concern in Zionist circles.The paper also points out Irans existence in the Panama Canal and writes: Crossing the Panama Canal is Tehrans last step to broaden its impact in the yard of the United States.
By sending these warships Iran not just projects its power it can target its enemies within a radius of 2,000 kilometers if necessary.By sending out the warships to faraway waters, Iran also sends out messages that it can not be approved, has the capability to keep an eye on world trade, has the capability to attack distant locations.
In addition, Iran has left behind previous levels of disputes with the West and got in a new level.
Likewise, it has stabilized its local power, able to respond to the requirements of allies, expand its arms market, speed up the transition of the worldwide system to multipolar, reduce the United States military power in the region, put pressure on extra-regional nations, do something about it versus unlawful moves, reinforce Irans political position, lower pressure on other military-security sectors, increasing deterrence, etc.The Navy has also sent warships to Australian waters.
There are factors for the presence of the Iranian fleet there: trying to get into military interactions in East Asia, cautioning to counter disturbance to oil shipment in the region, handling the AUKUS risks and participation in interactions in the Antarctic.Khorasan: PM Sudani on the rail of unusual positionsWhile Iraqi PM Mohammed Shia al Sudani revealed on his current trip to Germany that no timetable has actually been set for the withdrawal of American troops from his country, Iraqi resistance groups have actually consistently cautioned about the continued existence of American forces in the nation, Khorasan wrote.In the meantime, Ayed Al-Hilali, a prominent member of the Iraqi Shiite Coordination Framework, says: There is a distinction in between the positions of Mohammad Shia al-Sudani and some parties in the Framework on the presence of the U.S.
military troops in the country, in such a way that celebrations inside the coalition, demand complete expulsion of these forces throughout Sudanis premiership, but he, in addition to some other parties, want the existence to go on.Ayed Al-Hilali even more stated: Not long earlier, contrary to expectations, al-Sudani utilized a fake name in a declaration about the [Persian] Gulf Cup of Nations.
Considering that Iraq is an ally of Iran and Sudani is a close friend of Iran we did not expect him to make such a statement.Abdul Zahra Al-Kanaani, an analyst and academic, likewise specified: The withdrawal of the U.S.
forces is a fundamental problem and al-Sudanis statements might cause a crisis within the bloc.The expulsion of American troops should be Iraqs response to the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani and PMU deputy leader Al-Muhandis, Al-Kanaani remarked.Iran: Think tanks for espionage! The Iran paper has actually investigated the execution of Alireza Akbari who had actually been convicted of spying for the UK, in addition to the method the MI6 tricks spies from proving ground.
The paper writes: MI6s efficiency reveals that they have been concentrating on people who are active in specific fields such as human rights, environment, society, and most importantly research activities.
The article refers to the Supreme Leaders statement on October 19, 2022, in which he considered overlook of the opponent to be one of the dangers facing the elites and stated, Based on reputable information, the intelligence services welcome the elites under the guise of scientific centers to deceive and draw in the elites or to destroy their minds, and they likewise provide themselves as really polite and intelligent so that they can advance their plan.
It likewise describes the memoirs of Army General Hossein Fardoust from the British intelligence organization and concludes that the strategy of the body to gather intelligence info is the exact same like the past and will not alter.