TEHRAN A recent short article published in the Foreign Policy Magazine attempts to present a story in which Irans function in Syria has actually been diminished by Turkeys growing influence following the fall of President Bashar al-Assad.
Galip Dalay in How Post-Assad Syria Could Unleash a New Regional Order, highlights the introduction of an HTS-led government in Damascus, the changing balance of power in the Levant, and the shifting obligations of regional and global actors.
The short article recommends that these modifications weaken Irans role and reconfigure Syrias location within the more comprehensive West Asia.However, this story not only oversimplifies the geopolitical intricacies however likewise perpetuates a condescending point of view that decreases sovereign countries and their struggles to bargaining chips in the hands of external powers.
While Assads fall unquestionably marks a turning point in Syrias history, it is neither a conclusive success for Turkey nor an irreversible loss for Iran.
The ongoing changes in Syria highlight the complexities of local politics, where Iran stays a crucial gamer with deep-rooted impact.
The post reviews the altering positionings in West Asia and renewed Turkish ambitions.
These developments have undeniably improved the political landscape of Syria and its next-door neighbors.
Framing these shifts as a definitive defeat for Iran fails to account for the resilience and flexibility of Irans regional method.
HTS signing up with the Resistance: compound or reveal? The post argues that an HTS-led federal government might challenge Israel over its addition of the Golan Heights and provide organic support to the Palestinian cause, placing it as a more genuine ally to Palestinians than Iran.
This claim seems both simplified and deceptive.
Irans decades-long dedication to the Palestinian cause is well-documented, marked by consistent support for groups such as Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad that underscore its steadfast opposition to Zionist aggression.HTSs purported alignment with the Palestinian cause is unlikely to translate into meaningful action.
Its reliance on Turkey weakens its trustworthiness as an independent star in the Resistance.
Turkeys history of practical transactions with Israel and its Western ties suggests that HTSs anti-Israel stance may be more symbolic than substantive.
In contrast, Iran stays the central pillar of Resistance, guaranteeing the Palestinian battle is not made use of for short-term political gain.
Limits of external interferenceThe short article suggests that the existing regional dynamics mark a turning point in which other powers, particularly Arab states and Turkey, might marginalize Irans function in Syria.
However, this interpretation ignores the wider historical and geopolitical context.
For over a years, Iran has shown its ability to endure external pressure and adjust to altering situations.
Its deep financial, cultural, and military ties to Syria, created throughout years of war and restoration, provide it with a structure of impact that can not be quickly displaced.
Additionally, the divisions between HTS, Kurdish factions in the northeast, and other nationalist groups make it unlikely that any single actor can consolidate control over the country.A vision of stability and resistanceUnlike the opportunistic methods of some regional gamers, Irans vision for Syria focuses on stability, sovereignty, and long-lasting development.
Iran has consistently promoted for a political service that appreciates Syrias territorial integrity and empowers its people to rebuild their nation.
This method contrasts dramatically with the exploitative methods of stars looking for to advance their own programs at Syrias cost.
The short articles comparisons between Syrias current situation and Libyas fragmentation highlight the dangers of external interference.
If regional and global stars continue to prioritize short-term gains over sustainable solutions, Syria could face a prolonged period of instability and department.
Irans commitment to the concepts of sovereignty and self-determination uses a feasible option, one focused on reconciliation and restoration.
The short articles portrayal of Irans position in Syria streamlines an intricate truth.
While the fall of Assad and the increase of HTS might appear to signify a shift in regional dynamics, the more comprehensive image informs a various story.
Turkeys overreach, HTSs unforeseen future, and Irans long lasting influence ensure that Syrias future remains far from chosen.
Iran stays securely devoted to the concepts of sovereignty, resistance, and stability.
History has revealed that external disturbance can not bring about enduring stability.