TEHRAN - In a note, Jam-e-Jam emphasized the significance of preparing to counter Americas mental warfare versus Iran.The article argued that the most extreme fight between Iran and the United States is not financial, political, or military but psychological.
Consequently, all sectors of society need to actively participate in this ongoing fight.
The United States, the post declared, is leveraging mental operations to achieve its objectives, trying to propagate the idea that development and progress are unattainable unless Iran reverts to its past relationship with America.
The short article worried that the warning from the Leader of the Islamic Revolution on this matter is both informative and immediate, advising alertness versus such techniques.
It concluded that Americas supreme objective is to dominate Iran, and any compliance with U.S.
needs would oppose the interests and goals of the Iranian individuals.
Capitulation to U.S.
pressures, it cautioned, would fail to please public expectations.Ham Mihan: Negotiations should not delay individualss livesIn an interview with Ham Mihan, Abdolreza Farajirad, a geopolitics teacher, discussed the importance of resolving Irans membership in the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
He highlighted that signing up with FATF might provide a way for Irans banking system to overcome constraints related to cash laundering and other monetary difficulties.
Farajirad kept in mind that even if Iran reaches a nuclear agreement with the West, issues within the banking system and monetary exchanges would continue as long as the country stays on the FATF blacklist.
Nations will not engage with us if we are blacklisted, he discussed.
He argued that advancing negotiations with the West could enhance prospects for solving the FATF concern.
Farajirad also slammed the politicization of FATF within Iran, where it has actually become knotted in foreign policy arguments and domestic political rivalries.
He cautioned that inactiveness on this front would damage relations with even friendly countries.
The lives of the people ought to not be postponed by settlements, he concluded, worrying the requirement for practical solutions.
Arman-e-Melli: Iraqi PMs moderating role in TehranIn a commentary, Arman-e-Melli analyzed Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudanis visit to Tehran, highlighting his growing influence as a crucial local politician.
The piece noted Iraqs efforts to moderate the Iran-Saudi dispute and al-Sudanis outreach to the brand-new Syrian government as proof of his emerging stature.
Al-Sudanis trip to Iran drew considerable speculation, with numerous questioning whether he brought messages from the United States relating to Irans activities in Iraq, especially concerning the Hashd al-Shaabi forces.
The editorial suggested that Sudani most likely sought to reconcile Iranian support for Iraqi Resistance groups with U.S.
issues, intending to prevent friction with Washington while preserving the function of Hashd al-Shaabi in Iraqs security landscape.Siasat-e-Rooz: Wests plot to divide Iran will failSiasat-e-Rooz dedicated its editorial to exposing the Wests false ambitions to divide Iran, arguing that such plans will eventually fail.
The piece implicated the United States and Israel of exploiting Turkey to enhance their program, keeping in mind that Ankara is unlikely to play a definitive function in Syrias future.
The West, the editorial mentioned, has actually used support for Kurdish groups in the region to execute its dissentious policies, which will also have effects for Turkey.
However, it asserted that Iran is fully equipped to counter such separatist agendas, thanks to the awareness and unity of its people and leadership.
The piece criticized Turkeys approach to regional concerns, particularly its Pan-Turkism policies, which have actually in some cases worked against Irans interests, such as in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict and the proposed Zangezur Corridor.
While highlighting Irans past presentations of friendship to Turkey, the editorial called for Ankara to clarify its position and cautioned that rely on Turkeys current policies is decreasing.
The editorial concluded with a firm declaration: The policy of separatism will not succeed in Iran.
Both individuals and the government are resolute in resisting such efforts.