INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Trump's outrage over another apparent chemical weapons attack by Syrian President Bashar Assad was clear
And for the second time in his presidency, the U.S
commander-in-chief demanded retaliation.As images of sick or dying children flooded global media all week, the U.S
guided-missile destroyer USS Winston Churchill was en route to the Mediterranean to join a flotilla of allied warships, including another
destroyer, the USS Donald Cook.It was a ruse.While both vessels carry as many as 90 Tomahawk missiles -- the main weapon used in the Friday
evening strike on Syria -- neither ship in the end fired a shot
Instead, according to a person familiar with White House war planning, they were part of a plan to distract Russia and its Syrian ally from
an assault Assad's government could do little to defend itself against.It worked
Pentagon officials on Saturday said they faced little resistance to their targeted attack on what they said were three Syrian chemical
Most of the Syrian countermeasures, including defensive ballistic missiles, were fired after U.S
and allied weapons hit their targets, Lieutenant General Kenneth McKenzie told reporters on Saturday."No Syrian weapon had any effect on
anything we did," McKenzie said
He described the joint U.S., French and U.K
strike as "precise, overwhelming and effective."It wasn't a predetermined outcome
Earlier in the week Trump appeared to telegraph his intentions to the world with a tweet
"Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria
Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and 'smart!"'Analysts suggested Assad's regime would respond to Trump's threats
by protectively moving weapons and personnel away from likely targets
An already difficult battle plan -- which required hitting Assad without provoking Russian reprisals or injecting the U.S
fireIn the White House, Trump met with military officials and made several calls to his French and British counterparts with the goal of
following through on a threat to impose a "big price'' on Syria.During a meeting with the National Security Council and top military leaders
early in the week, Trump had been presented five large target options -- called sets -- for potential strikes, according to the person
The president largely listened as Pentagon chief Jim Mattis, Joint Chiefs Chairman Marine Corps General Joe Dunford and other military
leaders did most of the talking
New National Security Adviser John Bolton -- who started Monday -- and Vice President Mike Pence were also on hand.The president asked
Bolton and the military leaders to justify each potential target, and was particularly focused on limiting the risk of escalation by Russia
There was unanimity among Trump's top national security staff about conducting strikes but debate about how hard to hit the Syrians, the
person said.United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley was especially blunt in her assessment of the Syrian regime during meetings with Trump,
the person said.Haley told the UN Security Council on Friday that Assad and his Russian backers were to blame for the deaths of thousands of
In a private meeting with Trump and national security officials earlier in the week, Haley was a leading voice pushing for a robust military
response to the chemical weapons attack on humanitarian grounds, the person said.Dunford told reporters Friday that the U.S
sought targets that would limit any involvement with Russian military forces in Syria and reduce the risk of civilian casualties.Trump, who
just a week earlier said he wanted to pull U.S
troops out of Syria "very soon," didn't want to become drawn into the civil war there and instead focused the military response on deterring
the use of chemical weapons, according to the official.Trump spoke multiple times over the course of the week with French President Emmanuel
allies on board and the USS Winston Churchill arriving in the Mediterranean region, the attack was nearly underway.As the president
addressed the nation at 9 p.m
Washington time, a barrage of 105 U.S., U.K
and French missiles converged on Syria
They came from the Red Sea, the Arabian Gulf and the Mediterranean, homing in from three directions to overwhelm whatever missile defenses
Assad's regime might employ
Russia's more advanced air defense system didn't engage the allied weapons.According to the Pentagon, the allied weaponry included 19 new
"Extended-Range" stealthy Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Attack Munitions launched by two B-1B bombers based out of Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar,
and six Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from the Virginia-class USS John Warner submarine
The bomber-launched missiles, build by Lockheed Martin Corp., had never previously been used in combat.The cruiser USS Monterey fired 30
Tomahawks and the destroyer USS Laboon fired seven Tomahawks from the Red Sea
The destroyer USS Higgins fired 23 Tomahawks from the North Arabian Gulf, according to McKenzie.The weapons also included French SCALP-EG
cruise missiles and British Storm Shadow standoff missiles launched by Tornado and Typhoon jets
Nine SCALP missiles were fired at what the Pentagon said was a chemical weapons storage complex at Hims-Shinshar, along with two SCALPS,
nine Tomahawks and eight Storm Shadows.The morning after the barrage, Trump tweeted "Mission Accomplished!", the same phrase President
Bush used after the Iraq invasion 15 years ago to signal the end of major combat operations.That may be a phrase Trump, like Bush, learns to
The latest U.S.-led operation was narrow in scope, with little damage done to Assad's war-fighting capabilities
The country remains a melange of foreign forces, militias and terrorist groups
Haley, the UN ambassador, said this week that Assad has used chemical weapons dozens of times since war broke out in 2011
He might well use them again.(This story has not been edited by staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
