INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
A $2 billion fraud at Punjab National Bank
(PNB) may have been perpetrated by a few employees, 54 to be precise, but it couldn't be detected because of prevalent risk-control and
previously alleged that a handful of staff at a single Mumbai branch issued fake bank guarantees over several years to help two jewellery
groups - led by Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi - raise billions of dollars in foreign credit and commit country's biggest-ever bank
fraud.The bank's CEO Sunil Mehta told Reuters in April he had suspended 21 officials and "will not spare" others found involved in lapses,
but he also described the fraud as a "small turmoil".However, a 162-page internal report, produced by PNB officials tasked with probing the
fraud, lays bare lapses that go far beyond a few branch officers
The report, a copy of which was reviewed by Reuters, lays out how failings by 54 PNB officials - ranging from clerks to foreign exchange
managers, and auditors to heads of regional offices, allowed the fraud to be perpetrated
Eight of the 54 are among those who have been charged by the CBI for their roles in the scandal.The report, which the PNB officials
presented to the bank's fraud risk management arm on April 5, along with dozens of pages of annexed bank records and internal e-mails, is
also part of the evidence submitted by CBI in its court case against those allegedly involved in the fraud
The report's findings have not previously been made public.Ten Lapses, If Detected, Could Have Prevented $2 Billion PNB Fraud:1
System Violations: PNB investigators said one of the reasons the fraud went undetected for years was because of lapses within some of the
bank's critical areas at its New Delhi headquarters, such as its credit review and international banking units."There was enough evidence to
suggest failures," the team of four senior PNB investigators said in its report
"It was observed that blatant system violations/unethical practices/dereliction of responsibilities led bank to such a catastrophe."2
Lack of Integrated Systems: Shetty escaped detection because he did not log his SWIFT transactions on the bank's internal software -
something he was supposed to do because the two systems were not integrated.3
Fake Guarantees: Deputy manager Gokulnath Shetty deployed at PNB's Brady House branch, for years, issued fraudulent credit guarantees over
the SWIFT interbank messaging network, the bank and prosecutors have alleged
Using those guarantees, companies controlled by Nirav Modi and Choksi, received credit from banks overseas to fraudulently fund their
businesses, PNB alleges.4
Overlooking RBI Advisories: PNB investigators said the bank's international banking department and the IT division had delayed the
They had also not complied with central bank advisories in 2016 calling for a comprehensive audit of SWIFT systems in use.5
Lack of SWIFT Reconciliation: But more simply, the fraud could have been detected if the branch did the basic daily SWIFT reconciliation
that, according to internal rules, required logs of transactions on the global payments network to be manually checked against the bank's
internal system, the investigators said
"Only one activity would have nailed the whole act at the incipient stage," said the report.6
Ignorance by Regional Office: The lapses, however, extended beyond the branch
As per protocol, the daily reconciliation reports should travel up the chain to PNB's headquarters in New Delhi
Along the way, they would be signed off by the Brady House branch head and sent each month to a Mumbai city regional office that would issue
all-clear certificates for the branches it controls
But despite receiving just two of the 12 monthly reports from the Brady House branch last year, the regional office signed off on a "false"
compliance certificate, signalling a clean bill of health for the branch, the report said.7 Missing Paper Trail:
Moreover, despite a massive missing paper trail, none of the senior inspection officers, who conducted 10 visits between 2010 and 2017 to
the branch, reported anything "adverse", PNB's report stated.8
Brady House Branch Performance: The Mumbai city regional office also missed another vital red flag - the Brady House branch was a star
performer, largely because of its dealings with Modi firms, the PNB report said
Its import and export transactions in the 12 months to March 2017 stood at $3.3 billion, 50 percent higher than recorded two years prior
"The exceptional growth should have been noticed," the report said
A former PNB internal audit official who declined to be identified but reviewed the growth numbers mentioned in the report for Reuters,
said: "This was sufficient to raise a cause of concern and the reasons thereof should have been investigated."9
Weak Audit Practices: Signs that audit practices at Brady House were weak were also flagged by the branch itself, according to two internal
PNB documents reviewed by Reuters
In March 2012, the branch said in an internal memo that an almost 50 percent of the observations flagged in its annual inspection report -
mainly auditor queries - remained "un-replied/unattended to by respective concerned officers", calling it a "critical situation".Four years
later, in 2016, the branch's assistant general manager issued an internal memo saying around 18 observations -- five described as
zero-tolerance level issues -- were pending
division at Brady House in April 2010
Over the coming years, Shetty authorized more than 1200 fraudulent credit guarantees, the report said
As a mid-level employee, Shetty should only have been able to approve transactions of up to Rs 25 lakh ($37,000) without sign-off from more
But he had been given unlimited approval powers, the investigators said without explaining how this happened.In the few weeks before his
retirement in May last year, Shetty used his personal Yahoo e-mail address to send 22 e-mails -- 18 at around midnight -- to reconcile large
forex transactions involving the Modi group
The use of personal e-mail was "overlooked" by the bank's treasury department, the report said
Under PNB policy, no officer should remain in the same office for more than three years, but Shetty retired after serving in Brady House for
Three transfer orders were issued for him during his tenure, but he was never moved, the investigators found.The report said that it is
