INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
When AMD Ryzen 4000 for mobile was announced way back at CES 2020, AMD made some lofty promises about its performance, even stating that it
is faster than Intel's 9th-generation desktop chips
4000 chip in that laptop would hold up against the Intel Core i7-9700K, a desktop processor with a 95W TDP, and the results were very
the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS in the Zephyrus G14 scores 4,194 points, compared to the 3,726 points scored by the 9700K
super pretty for Intel here, either
Intel's desktop chip did get a stronger single-core score, getting 497 points to AMD's 481
This is totally within the margin of error at this point, and you'd be excused for saying that AMD has essentially matched Intel's
Core i7 against a Ryzen 9 processor, but with how much extra power desktop chips have at their disposal, even this shouldn't be an even
And, don't worry, we intend to more fully explore the differences between the Ryzen 9 4900HS and both the 9700K and the more powerful Core
i9-9900K.AMD Ryzen 4000 processors are offering truly desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor while also providing better battery
uphill battle if they're going to retain relevance
Intel's 9th-generation Coffee Lake Refresh-S processors came out way back in October 2018, so we're nearing two years without new silicon
next-generation Ryzen 4000 desktop processors also coming out this year, the bump up to a rumored Core i9 processor with 10 cores and 20
has officially become the underdog here
Team Red is beating Intel on every front at this point, Intel can barely even claim dominance in single-threaded workloads anymore
