INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
"isolation."
The spiteful essay accurately reflects the United States' feelings toward Iran
We all know that the United States is furious with Iran, but why?The reason is simple
Iran has not abandoned its revolutionary philosophy
Let us not forget that it was this revolutionary ideology that pushed the U.S
to enhance its efforts to topple the system and install one to power who would become its own puppet
Iran has refused to follow the world's big bully, the United States, under its revolutionary doctrine.The fight against arrogance is one of
the features of the Islamic revolution
Iran can come to a deal with the U.S
on two conditions: The U.S
must change its arrogant behavior, and Iran must reexamine its values
Neither of these two eventualities is seen to be likely
administrations have attempted to coerce or persuade Iran to reconsider its revolutionary ethos, but have failed
The reason is simple: U.S.-Iran normalization could prove deeply destabilizing to a theocratic government whose organizing principle has
It's an honest admission from a reputable American media institution about the failures of past U.S
The second section, on the other hand, is pure fabrication.The essay then goes on and on about how Iran values the "right amount of
isolation," but it fails to see that the "global system," as it is referred to in the essay, is not restricted to the United States and a
On the contrary, Iran maintains extensive diplomatic contacts with countries all across the world, from Africa to Latin America.Later, the
essay goes to point out that one or two agreements between Tehran and Washington cannot solve a deep-rooted problem
a representative Iranian government that is driven by the national interests of its people, rather than the revolutionary ideology of its
presidents have attempted to repair ties with Iran over the past 43 years
The notion appears to be absolutely false, given that the U.S
attempted to enter Iran militarily through Tabas during Jimmy Carter's rule, but failed
Throughout the imposed war from 1980 to 1989, the United States continually supported Saddam Hussein by giving modern weaponry and giving
satellite image of the Iranian forces in the battleground.The subsequent U.S
administrations did not hesitate to apply harsh, coercive sanctions on Tehran in order to bring the country to its knees
They have consistently backed armed opposition groups like the MEK (Mojahedin-e-Khalq Organization), as well as separatist movements in
Iranian provinces like Kurdistan, Khuzestan, and Azerbaijan.They openly supported Mir Hossein Mousavi, a presidential candidate who later
became an opposition leader whose true goal was to overthrow the system in 2009
They assassinated late General Qassem Soleimani, a valiant military leader who ended Daesh's (ISIS) power in Syria and Iraq and restricted
its influence to occasional operations now and then, and let's not forget that if he had been alive, he would have completely destroyed
also assisted its best friend, the Israeli regime, in assassinating Iran's top nuclear experts in broad daylight, and never criticized these
One is that the revolutionary powers do not live in a different world
Their perspective on the world is far broader than Cooper's.Furthermore, the statement demonstrates the United States' level of displeasure
and irritation with Iran, given that the underlying problem with Iran is that Tehran is a revolutionary government that does not follow the
laws set by Washington.Finally, the New York Times has brazenly targeted the Islamic Revolution's Leader
This is most likely owing to their proper understanding of the issue that the Leader is the captain of the ship, and he is a captain with a
precise and deep awareness of the nature of the United States
He has thus far foiled the enemy's many plans and conspiracies, and it is not surprising that the U.S
