INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
nepotism at ICICI Bank in advancing loans to Videocon and also what is seen as delayed response in the case of Axis Bank CEO Shikha
Sharma.
RBI has failed to fulfil its supervisory role in preventing the governance issues plaguing the banking sector, industry watchers
said.
They said allegations of wrong doing in ICICI Bank's case started some time in 2016
In Axis Bank's case, if the current CEO Shikha Sharma's term needed to be ended due to performance issues, it should have been done in July
2017 itself, when the bank board announced her reappointment as bank CEO well in advance
decision to give her a new four-year term.
RBI's silence in the ICICI's case is strange, as the case revolves around what is deemed to be a
systemically important bank (DSIB)
a long period when a loan is on the books of the bank
In the ICICI Bank case, it was called a systematically important bank by RBI, which means it has heightened supervision compared with other
entities that are not systematically important
The case pertains to ICICI Bank's celebrity MD and CEO Chanda Kochhar, who has come under the lens following a whistleblower revelation
that accuses Kochhar of wrongdoing and nepotism in advancing loans to Videocon
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is examining Kochhar's brother-in-law, who has a JV firm calledNuPowerRenewables with the
lens over allegations of nepotism and conflict of interest.
RBI performs financial supervision under the guidance of the Board for Financial
The board was first constituted in November 1994 as a committee of the Central Board of Directors of RBI
Its primary objective is to undertake consolidated supervision of the financial sector, comprising commercial banks, financial institutions
and non-banking finance companies.
In the case of Axis Bank, Shikha Sharma on Monday cut short her fourth term as the bank's CEO to December
2018 from 2021 as planned earlier
Axis Bank's non-performing assets (NPAs) soared more than 300 per cent in last three years
The bank's gross NPAs swelled to Rs 25,001 crore at the end of December 2017 from Rs 1,173 crore at the end of December 2009
Gross NPA ratio for the lender stood at 5.28 per cent in December 2017 against 1.23 per cent in December 2010.
Sandeep Parekh of Finsec Law
Advisor said while the allegations against ICICI Bank are serious, the Axis Bank case was just a performance issue.
"They are basically
opposite ends of spectrum
I do not even see the Axis case as a matter of corporate governance; it is a matter of performance
All banks, every single bank in India has issues of NPAs, which have surprised suddenly and these have not surfaced because they happened in
They have surfaced because regulators and banks had been suppressing the correct disclosures for the last seven-eight years," he said.
Data
suggests 39 listed banks had amassed Rs 8,86,074 crore in gross non-performing assets at the end of December quarter
Nineteen of these banks had gross NPAs (as percentage of total loans) in excess of 10 per cent
Parekh noted in August 2017, when Sebi tried to bring in new disclosure standards, RBI has actually opposed it.
The whole problem is of
kicking the can down the road of NPA recognition
The needed transparency in the banking sector did not take place
Unless we consider the mother question, all these are questions that become less important, he said.
Patnaik said she finds it very strange
pretending that it is just the board, it is just the individual, it is just one lady or her family or another lady or her family
