China hits out at NATO ‘double standards’

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
TEHRAN- Beijing has called on NATO to end its double-standards and abandon its Cold War mentality?The remarks were made in response to NATO
while the rest of the world is prohibited from making any military progress to defend and preserve its territorial integrity, independence
or sovereignty.But the NATO chief went a step further claiming the country was becoming a "more and more authoritarian power" that was
displaying assertive behavior, threatening Taiwan, and developing military capabilities.This is while the military alliance led by the
United States have military bases at every corner of the planet to wage wars, instigate or incite violence, provoke wars, and occupy large
and its NATO allies have fanned the flames of it.The terror which the U.S.-led military alliance has unleashed around the world under its
communities it terrorizes back at home or its neighbors in Latin America as a direct result of its own actions, never mind West Asia and
beyond, that makes the U.S
take orders from the Pentagon to regurgitate U.S
rhetoric against Beijing.The Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, did hit back, saying "that NATO, on one hand, keeps breaching
its traditional defense zones and areas, asking member countries to increase military spending and military build-up
This is a typical double-standard move
China adheres to the path of peaceful development and is the country with the best record on peace and security issues
We have never invaded any country nor never engaged in proxy wars, never engaged in military operations around the world, and never
where Beijing has dispatched its troops outside the Chinese mainland is a very small contingent in Africa as part of the United Nations
Peacekeeping Forces
In other words, to preserve the peace in Africa under the United Nations.On the contrary, the wars waged by the U.S.-led military alliance,
the number of proxy wars it has engaged in, the numbers of conflicts it has stirred as well as the number of countries it has threatened are
abandon its Cold War mentality and ideological bias and seriously reflect on what role it actually plays for the stability of Europe and the
world, instead of stirring up conflicts and playing up the Chinese threat everywhere." the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said.NATO
claims China is not an adversary, but the military measures and provocations it has made against China, in particular the U.S., would
Under international law it is part of China, something that is recognized by the U.S
itself
Under the one-China policy, which has a clear and unambiguous meaning, there is only one China and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China
The government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government representing entire China.If anything, it is U.S
and NATO-backed separatist forces in Taipei that are displaying assertive behavior, threatening the Chinese mainland.China has also reacted
to White House allegations that the Chinese balloon shot down was part of a fleet that spanned five continents.This is in reference to a
the unintended and unexpected entry of the unmanned civilian airship into U.S
is the number one country in surveillance and reconnaissance
The U.S
narrative is probably part of the information and public opinion warfare the U.S
has waged on China
civilian unmanned airship strayed into the U.S
airspace due to accidents and incidents caused by force majeure
The facts are clear and cannot be distorted or smeared
However, the U.S
turned a deaf ear and insisted on indiscriminate use of force against the civilian airship that was about to leave U.S
airspace
It obviously overreacted and seriously violated the spirit of international law and international practice.China says it resolutely opposes
and strongly protests the use of force in shooting its unmanned civilian aircraft, and has called on the U.S
not to take further actions that harm China's interests, and not to escalate or expand the tension.The Chinese government says it is paying
close attention to the development of the situation, and will resolutely safeguard the rights and interests of Chinese companies, resolutely
States turned a deaf ear and insisted on indiscriminate use of force against the civilian airship that was about to leave the United States
airspace
saying.The irony is that during the era of President Donald Trump, the White House rhetoric against Beijing was more intense and
provocative.The Pentagon now says there were three instances during the Trump administration of Chinese balloons swaying over the U.S., yet
even Trump did not make a fuss as experts say the intelligence clearly suggested at the time these were balloons of a civilian nature
(Trump has since denied the claim).The suspicious timing of the U.S
announcement and its sinister accusations against China, on the eve of U.S
its provocative measures against the growing economic superpower.However, the Biden administration appears to have fewer cards to provoke
China with.This is why it resorted to the use of force over a weather balloon with limited self-steering capability and deviated far from
its planned course and entered into the airspace of Latin America and the Caribbean.Washington is clearly desperate and its latest dramatic
filmed actions of warplanes overreacting by shooting down a civilian aircraft (at the orders of President Biden) is yet another sign of