INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
touches on a pressing issue of our era: whether to accept state-backed censorship in the name of perceived safety.This law demands clarity
has initiated legal action.According to the suit, the law coerces social media to eliminate certain content seen in California as
unlawful.It forces companies to disclose their moderation policies
The lawsuit also says companies must take public stances on divisive issues.Musk Spurs California to Weigh Free Speech Against Public Safety
(Photo Internet reproduction)Governor Gavin Newsom endorsed this law last year
added.The challenge remains to define what constitutes hate speech and who gets to make that definition
Left and right have pretty opposing views on this.BackgroundThe lawsuit brings into focus the balance between free speech and public safety
Laws like AB 587 are born from concerns about online harm.But they can spark debates about who sets the content rules
His prior comments and tweets have made headlines.So, the legal battle also questions the role of platform owners in shaping public
discourse.Advertisers also play a part in this dynamic
