INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Former US special envoy for Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad said in a post on X early Thursday that a claim in House Foreign Affairs Chairman
Michael McCaul’s draft resolution on him having said he “baselessly asserted the Taliban (IEA) would honor commitments” was
untrue.Khalilzad said the draft resolution states he “baselessly asserted the Taliban would honor their commitments and respect basic
human rights.”“This statement is flatly untrue
I never made such a statement
I am surprised that such a claim would be made without documentation – ‘baselessly,’ so to speak,” he said.On Wednesday, House
Republicans voted to censure President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for the disastrous U.S
withdrawal from Afghanistan, capping their work in Washington with legislation that carried no legal weight but drove a political point
ahead of the November elections.The resolution condemned Biden, Harris and other officials in the administration for “decision-making and
execution failures throughout the withdrawal from Afghanistan” and blamed them for the deaths of 13 U.S
service members who were killed by a suicide bomber at Kabul’s airport during the final days of the evacuation.With regards to the Doha
agreement, the resolution stated: “Whereas, in 2021, under the Biden-Harris administration, Special Representative for Afghanistan
Reconciliation, Zalmay Khalilzad, baselessly asserted the Taliban would honor their commitments and respect basic human rights.”
Khalilzad
responded by saying in his post on X: “The Doha Agreement that I helped negotiate under President Trump did not deal with human
rights.“It dealt with the terms for the safe military withdrawal including no attacks on US forces, and not allowing terrorists,
individuals or groups, including al-Qaida, to use Afghanistan soil to threaten the security of the United States and our allies.“The
Taliban (IEA) had agreed that a new government for Afghanistan – and presumably its human right policies – would subsequently and
separately be negotiated between them, the (former) Afghan government, and other Afghans.“Some such negotiations took place, but no
agreements were arrived at before the completion of our withdrawal,” Khalilzad said.He went on to state that Biden decided not to
condition the US withdrawal on a political agreement among Afghans, fearing a return to Islamic Emirate attacks against US forces if
Intra-Afghan negotiations dragged on.“Aside from adding four months to the withdrawal timeline, the Biden Administration did not make any
other changes in the Doha Agreement,” he said
“In addition to not having made any statement about the Taliban (IEA) honoring commitments on human rights, in my appearances before
various congressional committees, whenever asked whether I trusted the Taliban (IEA) to honor their commitments in regard to military
matters and terrorism, my reply invariably was that we were talking about international relations, an arena in which no one can be trusted,
and least of all the Taliban (IEA).“I emphasized that it was not about trust
The agreement as negotiated was condition-based, not trust-based, and delivering on our commitments in the agreement was linked to the
Taliban’s (IEA) delivery on its commitments, which would need to be continuously evaluated and verified.“I did report that the Taliban
(IEA) were – up to the time of my appearances – honoring their commitment not to attack US forces and needed to do more to meet their
obligation on terrorism.“Indeed, several elements of the agreement remain unfulfilled by us because the Taliban (IEA) have not fulfilled
some of their commitments,” he said.Khalilzad concluded by saying: “Undeniably, the final phase of the withdrawal was a disaster.“The
main reasons for this were a.) poor intelligence (we did not foresee that the Afghan government would simply collapse before we had even
departed or that its military would essentially dissolve and b.) our own inadequate military planning and execution in light of those
unexpected developments.“Our soldiers performed heroically under the circumstances, which had devolved into chaos in and around Kabul
Airport,” he said.The post Khalilzad responds to McCaul’s draft resolution, says Doha agreement claim is ‘flatly untrue’ first
