Traitor by nature

INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
TEHRAN - In a note, Sobh-e-No discussed the shameful demand of some foreign-based opposition groups for military attacks on Iran.It wrote:
Recently, some foreign-based opposition groups have sent messages to Donald Trump demanding that sanctions against Iran are not enough and
that Iran's infrastructure should be destroyed
This is not the first time that some oppositionists are threatening Iran's national interests through their actions and requests
Previously, these groups strongly supported the policy of "maximum pressure" and publicly demanded the imposition of tough sanctions against
Iran
Now, they have changed policy from economic boycott to military attack, entering a new stage of betrayal
Such demands show that these opposition groups have no understanding of the conditions of the people of our country
This obvious contradiction between slogans of freedom and anti-people actions only leads to the weakening of the position of these
groups.Jam-e-Jam: Eurasian Union and Iran's opportunitiesRecently, Iran became an observer member of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU
Some EEU member countries are our neighbors with whom we can have good economic and political relations
This provides a very good opportunity for the commercial sector of our country to buy goods from this group of countries as they are very
rich
They are producers of gas, oil, electricity, and energy in general
If we succeed in the Eurasian Union, our political relations with the member countries of the union will definitely be strengthened and we
can help each other in the difficult times
relations
Our relations with the EEU member states are good both bilaterally and politically, but if the political relations do not help to improve
the economic conditions, the goals will not be realized in the long term.Arman-e-Emrooz: Propagation of an attack on Iran's nuclear sites In
a commentary, Arman-e-Emrooz dealt with the propagation of an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities by Israel and the United States
It wrote: Undoubtedly, the situation in the region is highly dangerous
war with Iran
In the first two years of his presidency, Trump will most likely impose heavy economic and political pressure on Iran, and Europe will also
accompany him
In such a situation, a possible activation of the trigger mechanism and the return of sanctions and UN resolutions are high
Given the developments in the region, the most important challenge for the West is the nuclear issue
Trump is looking for a direct negotiation and an agreement, but an agreement beyond the JCPOA
America and others are looking for a deep integration of Israel into the security and economic order of the region
But if an agreement is reached with Trump, we will likely see the reduction or suspension of sanctions, not a lifting of them
significant points in the negotiations between Iran and the European troika is that Iran should join FATF
Supporters of joining FATF at home insist that this issue can be a step toward resolving some of the country's economic problems
By doing this, they say, Iran will send a positive signal to the Western parties and this would give Tehran an upper hand in the
negotiations
But the record of the West is full of disloyalty
Neither Europe nor the United States fulfilled their JCPOA commitments
Considering the history of the West's behavior, the correct policy for Iran is to link FATF to lifting sanctions, verifying their removal,
and a commitment by the Western sides not to restore the sanctions
In the JCPOA, Iran was the pioneer in implementing its commitments, but the West did not honor any of its undertakings
Therefore, this time it is the turn of the Western side to lift sanctions in the first step, and after a verification, Iran's first step,