INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
TEHRAN - In a note, Jam-e-Jam emphasized the significance of preparing to counter Americas mental warfare versus Iran.The article argued
that the most extreme fight between Iran and the United States is not financial, political, or military but psychological
Consequently, all sectors of society need to actively participate in this ongoing fight
The United States, the post declared, is leveraging mental operations to achieve its objectives, trying to propagate the idea that
development and progress are unattainable unless Iran reverts to its past relationship with America
The short article worried that the warning from the Leader of the Islamic Revolution on this matter is both informative and immediate,
advising alertness versus such techniques
It concluded that Americas supreme objective is to dominate Iran, and any compliance with U.S
needs would oppose the interests and goals of the Iranian individuals
pressures, it cautioned, would fail to please public expectations.Ham Mihan: Negotiations should not delay individualss livesIn an interview
with Ham Mihan, Abdolreza Farajirad, a geopolitics teacher, discussed the importance of resolving Irans membership in the Financial Action
He highlighted that signing up with FATF might provide a way for Irans banking system to overcome constraints related to cash laundering and
other monetary difficulties
Farajirad kept in mind that even if Iran reaches a nuclear agreement with the West, issues within the banking system and monetary exchanges
would continue as long as the country stays on the FATF blacklist
Nations will not engage with us if we are blacklisted, he discussed
He argued that advancing negotiations with the West could enhance prospects for solving the FATF concern
Farajirad also slammed the politicization of FATF within Iran, where it has actually become knotted in foreign policy arguments and domestic
He cautioned that inactiveness on this front would damage relations with even friendly countries
The lives of the people ought to not be postponed by settlements, he concluded, worrying the requirement for practical solutions
Arman-e-Melli: Iraqi PMs moderating role in TehranIn a commentary, Arman-e-Melli analyzed Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudanis
visit to Tehran, highlighting his growing influence as a crucial local politician
The piece noted Iraqs efforts to moderate the Iran-Saudi dispute and al-Sudanis outreach to the brand-new Syrian government as proof of his
Al-Sudanis trip to Iran drew considerable speculation, with numerous questioning whether he brought messages from the United States relating
to Irans activities in Iraq, especially concerning the Hashd al-Shaabi forces
The editorial suggested that Sudani most likely sought to reconcile Iranian support for Iraqi Resistance groups with U.S
issues, intending to prevent friction with Washington while preserving the function of Hashd al-Shaabi in Iraqs security
landscape.Siasat-e-Rooz: Wests plot to divide Iran will failSiasat-e-Rooz dedicated its editorial to exposing the Wests false ambitions to
divide Iran, arguing that such plans will eventually fail
The piece implicated the United States and Israel of exploiting Turkey to enhance their program, keeping in mind that Ankara is unlikely to
play a definitive function in Syrias future
The West, the editorial mentioned, has actually used support for Kurdish groups in the region to execute its dissentious policies, which
will also have effects for Turkey
However, it asserted that Iran is fully equipped to counter such separatist agendas, thanks to the awareness and unity of its people and
The piece criticized Turkeys approach to regional concerns, particularly its Pan-Turkism policies, which have actually in some cases worked
against Irans interests, such as in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict and the proposed Zangezur Corridor
While highlighting Irans past presentations of friendship to Turkey, the editorial called for Ankara to clarify its position and cautioned
that rely on Turkeys current policies is decreasing
The editorial concluded with a firm declaration: The policy of separatism will not succeed in Iran
Both individuals and the government are resolute in resisting such efforts.
