INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
for politically motivated allegations against the nation.Tehran dismissed the resolution for alleged "repression of human rights and women's
rights" as lacking legal foundation and being part of a broader interventionist agenda.Marzieh Afkham, Director General for Human Rights and
Women at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs criticized the resolution, describing it as "a repetitive act indicative of an interventionist and
politically motivated approach" within the European body.She argued that such resolutions overlook the progress Iran has made in enhancing
its human rights record, including legislative reforms aimed at improving women's rights and ensuring broader freedoms.Additionally, Afkham
condemned the resolution as "irresponsible," asserting that Iran's judicial system is professional and independent."The Iranian judicial
system is a professional and independent entity, and judicial processes in the country are always based on law and adhere to the principles
of fair trial," she stated.Afkham emphasized that Iran rejects any foreign interference in its judicial processes, considering such actions
contrary to international law principles.On January 23, the European Parliament adopted a resolution, condemning what it alleged was a
with additional disdain by Tehran.Afkham described the parliament's stance on the IRGC as "completely baseless and condemnable."She
explained that the IRGC is a legal and popular institution, playing a fundamental role in safeguarding Iran's national security, defending
against aggression, and combating terrorism in the region."Any affront against this homeland defender will face a decisive response from the
Islamic Republic of Iran," Afkham warned.Afkham also voiced Tehran's dissent with the interventionist positions of some European Parliament
members, urging them to learn from past mistakes.She concluded by asserting that the European Parliament should "take steps towards
respecting its international legal obligations and play a constructive role in promoting peace, stability, and human rights," rather than
supporting terrorist groups, which she said equates to endorsing and encouraging violence and violating fundamental human rights.
