INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
TEHRAN - Western media and experts like to have their own interpretations of events
Theres absolutely nothing incorrect with that! As long as these interpretations are not completely inconsistent to truth
Among these occasions is the dispute between Iran and the United States
presidents, whether Democrat or Republican, disagree on many concerns, but Iran is perhaps the only subject on which they have little
disagreement.Imagine a group of individuals planning to take someones life
Individual A says they must be shot; B believes eliminating them with a knife is quieter and much better; C recommends strangling them with
a rope; and D thinks they should be slowly deteriorated and lowered
The difference in the point of views of U.S
presidents toward the Islamic Republic of Iran is basically of this nature.However, a lot of Western analysts prefer to disregard to this
truth and accuse Irans Leader of having a purely ideological method in this regard, claiming that Ayatollah Khameneis opposition comes from
Limiting the cause of this opposition to ideology is a distortion of truth
The truth is that, first of all, the Islamic Republic of Iran has actually negotiated with the United States on various problems multiple
times over the previous two decades
If the issue were ideological, such negotiations would not have actually taken place at all.Secondly, as Ayatollah Khamenei has actually
plainly specified, the primary reason for Irans opposition to negotiations originates from the experience of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive
Iran revealed optimum versatility in the JCPOA negotiations and did not fail to meet any regards to the contract reached in 2015
The other side refused to meet its commitments under various pretexts, and eventually Trump unilaterally withdrew from the agreement on May
withdrawal, Iran totally followed its dedications for a year, and just then did it slowly suspend some of its commitments under the
JCPOA.What Trump signed a couple of days earlier as a presidential memorandum shows that what Trump states and what he wants are basically
Trump states he wants to negotiate with Iran and only wishes to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, however what he wants goes far
beyond a nuclear contract
The list of these needs is so comprehensive that it even consists of Irans conventional weapons, effectively seeking to strip Iran of even
its protective and traditional weapons in a region where human lives have the least value.Sitting at the negotiating table with the United
States would amount endorsing the impression of a weak Iran and would have severe consequences for Tehran
In any case, the ball remains in Washingtons court
If Trump really seeks a contract with Iran, he needs to distance himself from the temptations of Israel and those who imagine Irans
destruction and take a reasonable path
Such rationality appears not likely from someone who dreams of getting Greenland, Canada, and Gaza.Ayatollah Khamenei, in his speech on
April 9, 2015, clearly mentioned that if the Americans act relatively and sensibly in nuclear settlements, this might be an experience for
Iran, and negotiations with them on other problems might likewise be possible
This position reveals that Irans Leader thinks and chooses realistically, carefully, and in line with national interests concerning
settlements with the United States
If he is now opposed to settlements with the U.S., it is because of the behavior of the Americans themselves.
