INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
to Tehran.It wrote: Western-leaning publications had been claiming for a long time that America is a friend of Iran and Russia is an enemy,
But suddenly they claimed that the Russian Foreign Minister had come as a mediator on behalf of the United States and that Russian mediation
These publications imagine that every foreign official who visits Iran intends to mediate between Iran and the U.S.Siasat-e-Rooz: Foreground
of a dialogueSiasat-e-Rooz devoted its editorial to the new round of talks with the European troika and said: The important point that
should be said about the negotiations is that the principle of negotiations is not based on trust, but on honesty, and we cannot have
negotiations in which one side is demanding too much and makes threats
In recent months, the West has been exaggerating and creating fear about the snapback mechanism before the expiry of the JCPOA in October
It is not possible to talk about diplomacy and threaten to implement the snapback mechanism (that would return all UN Security Council
Resolutions against Iran)
The West should pay attention to the fact that Iran will not come to the negotiating table due to threats or sanctions, therefore, the West
will suffer the same fate as the United States by insisting on the policy of pressure and negotiation
From the point of view of Iran, negotiating with America would be irrational, unintelligent, and dishonorable
To build trust, Europe must first prove its political and economic independence
In this regard, announcing an official condemnation of the U.S
maximum pressure plan against Iran and taking steps to lift parts of Iran's economic sanctions could be a preliminary step towards building
trust.Ham Mihan: Maximum pressure will not workIn an article, Ham Mihan dealt with Trump's maximum pressure on Iran and wrote: Tensions
between Iran and the United States have reached a peak once again
Trump once again has applied his maximum pressure campaign on Iran and signed a presidential memorandum tightening sanctions and targeting
At the same time, Iran's Leader has rejected negotiations with the United States
Without a doubt, this exchange of positions will not resolve the dispute between Iran and the United States for the foreseeable future
The reality is that the only effect of sanctions is strengthening conservatives and weakening reformists
Recently, an ultra-conservative movement in Iran has been talking about nuclear deterrence
In such circumstances, it is quite clear that maximum pressure will not have any results because there is no strategic goal behind this
policy.Arman-e-Melli: Iran will not enter negotiations under pressureIn an analysis, Arman-e-Melli discussed the denial of the visit of
high-ranking officials to Iran as a mediator and said: These days, newspapers are trying to convey this idea that the visits of high-ranking
officials to Iran are intended to send a message from the United States to Iran
This is while officials at the Iranian Foreign Ministry have been announcing that these visits have nothing to do with Iran and the United
The reality is that when Trump signed the maximum pressure policy against Iran, the Iranian government firmly announced that it would not
hold negotiations under pressure or threats under any circumstances
However, a percentage of people and even some political officials still expect a solution to be found to lift the sanctions
It seems that the United States is still trying to force Iran to give concessions in possible negotiations by applying economic pressure
Past experiences have also shown that this strategy has not been successful and Iran is still standing its ground
Therefore, it is America that must accept Iran's conditions to begin negotiations on an equal position.
