INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
Senate held a commission meeting on Friday to review the Afghanistan War, concentrating on the duration from 2001 to 2008
Numerous high-ranking U.S
policymakers, generals, and former Afghan officials went to the conference
Crucial concerns relating to the early years of the U.S
military presence in Afghanistan were addressed.Shamila Chaudhary, co-chair of the Afghanistan War Commission, said the conference
concentrated on the early years of the U.S
war in Afghanistan, specifically from 2001 to 2008
Chaudhary stated: “& ldquo; In this century, we released 2 wars beyond our borders —-- in Iraq and Afghanistan
These wars were discussed, justified, and criticized
This session, and the more comprehensive objective of this commission, is not about evaluating the past
It is about learning from it
The war in Afghanistan has never ever had easy conclusions
That doesn’& rsquo; t mean we ought to avoid attempting to understand it
If we do not analyze what occurred in Afghanistan, we run the risk of turning the war into an abstract principle.”& rdquo; In the
conference, General David Barno, former U.S
commander in Afghanistan, indicated an absence of coordination and connection in U.S
military management as reasons for the country’& rsquo; s failure in Afghanistan
& ldquo; I want to highlight three essential factors that, in my view, weakened America’& rsquo; s chances of success in Afghanistan over
two decades: initially, the relentless failure to successfully incorporate U.S
political, military, diplomatic, and economic efforts
Second, the fast turnover in U.S
military and diplomatic management in Afghanistan over 20 years
Third, the mishandling of external safe houses such as Pakistan,” & rdquo; said Barno.Andrew Natsios, former director of USAID, stated in
federal government’& rsquo; s goals in Afghanistan were never ever fixed up due to the fact that they were equally exclusive and
contradictory.Natsios mentioned: “& ldquo; Policymakers in Washington presumed that by investing vast amounts of money, they might achieve
excellent and favorable results in Afghanistan
But gradually, it became clear that these decisions were misdirected and intensified the situation
military and Afghan political leaders saw development just in construction tasks, whereas genuine development lay in structure and
fortifying organizations.”& rdquo; Meanwhile, Shamila Chaudhary also highlighted the value of listening to the views of Afghanistan’&
rsquo; s partners when resolving crucial questions about reconciliation with the Islamic Emirate and forming strategies on the Afghanistan
issue.It is likewise notable that two previous officials of the previous Afghan government attended this conference and shared their point
of views on the errors and failures of both the U.S
and the former Afghan government.The post US Senate assembles commission to evaluate early years of Afghanistan war initially appeared on
