INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
TEHRAN - In the grand theatre of international relations, Argentina has once again taken centre stage, but not for a performance worth
Argentina, grappling with an inflation rate that, while down to 84.5% in early 2025 from a staggering 211% in 2023, still suffocates its
citizens, is desperate for a $20 billion lifeline from the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
agreement with China, a financial mechanism that has been a critical buffer for its depleted reserves
tool of Chinese influence
bombing in Buenos Aires, which claimed 85 lives
Yet, this accusation echoes a troubling pattern that began immediately after the attack, when the Zionist owners of the AMIA centre pointed
The initial claim rested solely on a flimsy hypothesis: that Iran sought to retaliate for the cancellation of a nuclear technology and
material procurement contract concluded between the two nations during the presidency of Raul Alfonsin
No concrete evidence supported this theory, yet it set the tone for decades of baseless allegations, revealing a rush to judgment that reeks
of political expediency rather than a genuine pursuit of justice.The narrative against Iran gained traction over the years but not through
A key player in framing Iran has been the terrorist organization Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), whose agenda against Tehran is well-documented;
astonishingly, the testimonies of four MEK members were cited 61 times in the warrant, despite their dubious credibility
Yet, the evidence presented by Argentine authorities has been so unconvincing that even a British court in 2004 ruled there was insufficient
proof to link Iranian politicians to the attack, dismissing the allegations outright
Similarly, Interpol, finding the case against Iranian nationals ungrounded, refrained from executing an international arrest warrant and
Iran has steadfastly denied any involvement, and the absence of solid proof suggests Argentina is playing a dangerous game of diplomatic
cooperation in areas like trade or energy
Iran, known for its measured approach to global affairs, may choose to respond through diplomatic channels, possibly by reevaluating its
engagement with Argentina or seeking to address the issue through international forums
Argentina, already teetering on the edge of economic collapse with poverty levels exceeding 45%, can ill afford to alienate a country with
U.S.-dictated policies, a path that has proven disastrous for other nations
a diplomatic crisis with China
policy that ultimately yielded little strategic gain
Argentina risks a similar fate, sacrificing its sovereignty and long-term interests for short-term economic relief that may not even
the stringent austerity measures the IMF often demands
Iran, too, could be a partner in areas like energy or trade if Argentina were to pursue a balanced foreign policy rather than antagonizing
History shows that nations thrive when they prioritize sovereignty over subservience.In its reckless rift with Iran, Argentina is burning
bridges it can scarcely afford to lose, setting ablaze potential ties that could have fostered mutual benefit
From the halls of power in Buenos Aires, President Milei has chosen to fan the flames of U.S.-dictated hostility, ignoring the embers of
history that warn against such blind allegiance
This article first appeared/also appeared in https://www.tehrantimes.com
