INSUBCONTINENT EXCLUSIVE:
that the penalty handed out by the ICO last month was unfair, as there was "no evidence" that user information was shared
inappropriately.Facebook says that because the watchdog found no evidence that the personal data of UK users was shared without their
knowledge, the fine (the maximum value allowed by law) was unjustified.Around a million Facebook users in the UK are thought to have had
their account information unlawfully accessed by agents working for Cambridge Analytica
User information was directly harvested using a free personality quiz on the site, with the public data of their contacts also recorded.The
force following the supposed data collection.Facebook appeal"Their reasoning challenges some of the basic principles of how people should be
allowed to share information online, with implications which go far beyond just Facebook, which is why we have chosen to appeal," a
statement from Facebook's lawyer Anna Benckert said."For example, under the ICO's theory people should not be allowed to forward an email or
message without having agreement from each person on the original thread."These are things done by millions of people every day on services
across the internet, which is why we believe the ICO's decision raises important questions of principle for everyone online which should be
considered by an impartial court based on all the relevant evidence."The ICO has confirmed it has received Facebook's appeal, which will now
its case to the UK Court of Appeal.Want to ensure your online data stays private Here's our pick of the best VPN service of 2018
