Supreme Court, SC (Photo: Shutterstock)3 min read Last Updated : Sep 27 2024 | 10:57 PM ISTThe Supreme Court on Friday closed curative petitions by the Centre and Airports Authority of India (AAI) seeking reconsideration of its 2022 judgment allowing private firm GMR Airports to upgrade and operate Nagpurs Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport.GMR Airports can now operate Nagpurs airport.Click here to connect with us on WhatsAppThe court had sought the views of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre.One or two issues we may be able to argue...
but this may not fall under Rupa Ashok Hurra: Bias, lack of hearing and some other analogous ground...
so these proceedings cannot be made into an intra court appeal.
I must own my decision...
there was an opinion given by an earlier counsel hinting to a ground of bias...
but it is my professional opinion that there is no ground of bias and there cannot be any bias.
Union of India and AAI may not be necessary parties, he said.He said that he personally thinks that the curative petitions were not maintainable as it did not meet the threefold requirements that there was bias, lack of hearing, or any other analogous grounds.The solicitor general, however, requested the court to clarify the observation made by the high court that in such kind of contracts, the Union of India or the AAI are not necessary parties, saying that it may impact other contracts.The court agreed to clarify that this observation of the high court can't be read as a correct statement of law.The Bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai and JK Maheshwari recorded the solicitor generals statement and closed the matter.The learned solicitor general has, however, submitted that this court may issue a clarification as regards the findings in paragraph 51 of the impugned judgment (high court judgment) to the effect that in such matters, neither the Union of India nor the AAI are necessary parties.
The solicitor general submits that if the above statement of law is to continue to hold the field in future, certain difficulties may be encountered by the Union of India and the Airports Authority of India in future litigations.
We find the above approach of the solicitor general to be fair.
Based on the statement of the solicitor general, we record that the curative petition is not pressed before this court.
However, it is clarified that the observation in paragraph 51 of the impugned judgment to the effect that neither the Union of India nor the Airports Authority of India are necessary parties to such proceedings would not be reflective of the correct position of law and the issue is left open to be decided in an appropriate case to be decided in future, the court said.The Bombay High Court had upheld GMR's right to operate the airport, a decision that was affirmed by the Supreme Court in May 2022.Then, AAI attempted to challenge this verdict by filing a review petition, which was dismissed in May last year.After that a plea for a curative petition was filed.First Published: Sep 27 2024 | 9:53 PMIST